Philip Sekulic vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sekulic vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Sekulic vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sekulic 1 - 4 Tu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sekulic has won 49.46% of points on his second serve, while Tu has won 52.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sekulic, in recent form, has won 49.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 51.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.88% and 31.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sekulic has saved 63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 67.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sekulic has won 54.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 36), with Tu winning 55.71% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 109/ 57), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.84% of matches (W/L 21/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Sekulic winning 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Sekulic winning 2 and Tu winning 9. The last match between Sekulic and Tu was at the Taipei Challenger, 14-05-2024, First, Hard with Li Tu getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sekulic and Tu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sekulic winning 1 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sekulic winning 0, and Tu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sekulic has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.78 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 225.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sekulic has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sekulic has converted 42.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 38.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sekulic 1 - 4 Tu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
257
Rank
257
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total4
1
Hard3
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
194
Rank
186
High
27
Age
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
55% (90-73)
Career Total W/L
63% (160-94)
47% (14-16)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$92,390
Career Prize Money
$98,510
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Philip Sekulic | Li Tu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 4 |
Sets Won | 2 | 9 |
Games Won | 40 | 64 |
Aces (Total) | 16 | 30 |
DFs (Total) | 18 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:38 | 1:38:38 |
1st Serve % | 57% (194/338) | 63% (205/323) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (123/194) | 75% (153/205) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (58/144) | 51% (60/118) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (9/24) | 50% (20/40) |
Return Points W% | 34% (110/323) | 46% (157/338) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 80% (4/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
5-7 6-4 6-4 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
6-1 6-0 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
||||
6-3 6-4 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Philip Sekulic | Li Tu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (14/16) | 58% (14/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (34/37) | 58% (31/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (349/350) | 54% (283/244) |
Hard Win/Loss | 52% (14/13) | 58% (14/10) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 122 | 104 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 99 | 33 |
Avg Match Time | 2:3:5 | 1:33:10 |
Avg Opp Rank | 315.4 | 255.83 |
1st Serve % | 60% (1385/2303) | 65% (996/1524) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (953/1385) | 72% (717/996) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (454/918) | 53% (278/528) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (83/196) | 38% (58/152) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (839/2206) | 39% (611/1580) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (14/14) | 30% (3/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 90% (9/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (14/30) | 58% (14/24) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 36% (4/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 88% (16/14) |
1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 13% (16/2) |
1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 0% (8/0) |
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Remy Bertola
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
70 of
129)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Brandon Holt
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
110)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
14
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Andrew Fenty
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Sekulic
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Federico Cina
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
11
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Li Tu
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Li Tu
Player
Andre Ilagan
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more